Re: ULTRA ATA/100 announced

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Wed Jun 07 2000 - 07:40:28 EDT

Next message: Tigran Aivazian: "pty_unthrottle using i2c_tuner_init()???"

Previous message: Eric S. Raymond: "Re: I'm trying to identify the configuration-file maintainers"
In reply to: Daniel Taylor: "Re: ULTRA ATA/100 announced"
Next in thread: Martin Bene: "AW: ULTRA ATA/100 announced"
Next in thread: James Sutherland: "Re: ULTRA ATA/100 announced"
Next in thread: Jesse Pollard: "Re: ULTRA ATA/100 announced"
Next in thread: Andre Hedrick: "Re: ULTRA ATA/100 announced"
Reply: Martin Bene: "AW: ULTRA ATA/100 announced"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> If you try doing that with ATA you would need 7 or 8 free slots
> _just_for_drive_controllers_. Not to mention interrupts and interrupt
> loading (you would need a much faster CPU to deal with the IDE case).

Actually you need one slot per 16 drives with an 8 port 3ware controller

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Tigran Aivazian: "pty_unthrottle using i2c_tuner_init()???"
Previous message: Eric S. Raymond: "Re: I'm trying to identify the configuration-file maintainers"
In reply to: Daniel Taylor: "Re: ULTRA ATA/100 announced"
Next in thread: Martin Bene: "AW: ULTRA ATA/100 announced"
Next in thread: James Sutherland: "Re: ULTRA ATA/100 announced"
Next in thread: Jesse Pollard: "Re: ULTRA ATA/100 announced"
Next in thread: Andre Hedrick: "Re: ULTRA ATA/100 announced"
Reply: Martin Bene: "AW: ULTRA ATA/100 announced"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jun 07 2000 - 08:54:50 EDT