Re: how about SPX ?

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Wed Jun 07 2000 - 16:31:58 EDT

Next message: Jerry Lundström: "[Re: failure notice] - I realy don't want stuff like this!!!"

Previous message: Jerry Lundström: "[2.2.16] eepro100 driver"
In reply to: Lorinczy Zsigmond: "how about SPX ?"
Next in thread: Jeff V. Merkey: "Re: how about SPX ?"
Reply: Jeff V. Merkey: "Re: how about SPX ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> I tried to try SPX in 2.2.15, but I got kernel oops or
> strange messages:

It doesn't work

> Af_spx.c is quite old (1999-01-05) -
> is it maintained by anyone ?

Not afaik

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jerry Lundström: "[Re: failure notice] - I realy don't want stuff like this!!!"
Previous message: Jerry Lundström: "[2.2.16] eepro100 driver"
In reply to: Lorinczy Zsigmond: "how about SPX ?"
Next in thread: Jeff V. Merkey: "Re: how about SPX ?"
Reply: Jeff V. Merkey: "Re: how about SPX ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 09 2000 - 02:10:07 EDT