Re: how about SPX ?

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Wed Jun 07 2000 - 20:30:46 EDT

Next message: Mike Black: "2.4 and 2G File Limit?"

Previous message: ADAM Sulmicki: "DEC 3000/300 && Linux Kernel."
In reply to: Jeff V. Merkey: "Re: how about SPX ?"
Next in thread: Jeff V. Merkey: "Re: how about SPX ?"
Reply: Jeff V. Merkey: "Re: how about SPX ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> To whomever is attempting to use SPX, please forward me the Ooops info,
> and I'll attempt to take a look at it and fix it. The current SPX
> engine in Linux is incomplete, but I am willing to take a stab at
> looking at the bugs.

Finish writing it is closer. The connection accept logic for example is
entirely ficticious ;)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Mike Black: "2.4 and 2G File Limit?"
Previous message: ADAM Sulmicki: "DEC 3000/300 && Linux Kernel."
In reply to: Jeff V. Merkey: "Re: how about SPX ?"
Next in thread: Jeff V. Merkey: "Re: how about SPX ?"
Reply: Jeff V. Merkey: "Re: how about SPX ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 09 2000 - 02:11:40 EDT