Re: Security Fixes in 2.4.x too? (was: Re: Linux 2.2.16)

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Thu Jun 08 2000 - 15:53:58 EDT

Next message: Andrew Morton: "fix: 3c59x.c in test1-ac10"

Previous message: Mark Hahn: "Re: ATA queued commands (was Re: ULTRA ATA/100)"
In reply to: Ingo Oeser: "Security Fixes in 2.4.x too? (was: Re: Linux 2.2.16)"
Next in thread: Mads Bondo Dydensborg: "SORRY: Re: [SIKKERHED] Linux 2.2.16"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> > The following security problems are fixed by this release
>
> These are fixed in the 2.4.x series, aren't they?

The 2.4.0-test releases havent been through any kind of serious security
review yet. The answer is some of them

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andrew Morton: "fix: 3c59x.c in test1-ac10"
Previous message: Mark Hahn: "Re: ATA queued commands (was Re: ULTRA ATA/100)"
In reply to: Ingo Oeser: "Security Fixes in 2.4.x too? (was: Re: Linux 2.2.16)"
Next in thread: Mads Bondo Dydensborg: "SORRY: Re: [SIKKERHED] Linux 2.2.16"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 09 2000 - 02:16:37 EDT