Re: Running Untrusted Code in a Restricted Process

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Fri Jun 09 2000 - 19:44:06 EDT

Next message: Jeff Dike: "Re: Running Untrusted Code in a Restricted Process"

Previous message: Ryan Mack: "RAID Backport/Integration into 2.2.X?"
In reply to: jesse hammons: "Re: Running Untrusted Code in a Restricted Process"
Next in thread: Jeff Dike: "Re: Running Untrusted Code in a Restricted Process"
Next in thread: mad@students.zcu.cz: "Re: Running Untrusted Code in a Restricted Process"
Reply: Jeff Dike: "Re: Running Untrusted Code in a Restricted Process"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> The old version of the tracing code (at least in i386) didn't allow for
> syscall_trace to reject system calls.

Current 2.2.x does so.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jeff Dike: "Re: Running Untrusted Code in a Restricted Process"
Previous message: Ryan Mack: "RAID Backport/Integration into 2.2.X?"
In reply to: jesse hammons: "Re: Running Untrusted Code in a Restricted Process"
Next in thread: Jeff Dike: "Re: Running Untrusted Code in a Restricted Process"
Next in thread: mad@students.zcu.cz: "Re: Running Untrusted Code in a Restricted Process"
Reply: Jeff Dike: "Re: Running Untrusted Code in a Restricted Process"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 09 2000 - 20:35:55 EDT