Re: Red Hat (was Re: reiserfs)

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Sat Jun 10 2000 - 07:25:38 EDT

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: 3C59x Problem in 2.2.16"

Previous message: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: Red Hat (was Re: reiserfs)"
In reply to: Hans Reiser: "Re: Red Hat (was Re: reiserfs)"
Next in thread: Andreas 'Count' Kotes: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: Red Hat (was Re: reiserfs)"
Next in thread: Chris Mason: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggests delaying reiserfs integration)"
Reply: Andreas 'Count' Kotes: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: Red Hat (was Re: reiserfs)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> ReiserFS got some funding because the ext2 crowd didn't care to give the LVM
> author the time of day because he was in a rival faction, and we were more than

Duh ? Hans check your medication hasnt run out.

Just who was it who did the initial LVM merge into the 2.3.9x tree and
helped clean it up bit by bit until Linus accepted it ?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: 3C59x Problem in 2.2.16"
Previous message: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: Red Hat (was Re: reiserfs)"
In reply to: Hans Reiser: "Re: Red Hat (was Re: reiserfs)"
Next in thread: Andreas 'Count' Kotes: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: Red Hat (was Re: reiserfs)"
Next in thread: Chris Mason: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggests delaying reiserfs integration)"
Reply: Andreas 'Count' Kotes: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: Red Hat (was Re: reiserfs)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 10 2000 - 07:33:02 EDT