Re: supermount (was Re: Floppy handling)

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Sat Jun 10 2000 - 16:22:03 EDT

Next message: Trond Myklebust: "Re: 2.4 and 2G File Limit?"

Previous message: Martin Frey: "Mmaping vmallocated memory to user space"
In reply to: Alexander Viro: "Re: supermount (was Re: Floppy handling)"
Next in thread: Alexander Viro: "Re: supermount (was Re: Floppy handling)"
Reply: Alexander Viro: "Re: supermount (was Re: Floppy handling)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> On Fri, 9 Jun 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> > It definitely needs review, especially by the original SuperMount author
> > (sct?) Al Viro looked at one version of the patch and worried about
> > races.
>
> ... and SCT was somewhat unhappy about the inode-based implementation
> (<AOL></AOL> on that).

So you would also go for using the stackable fs stuff for this instead ?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Trond Myklebust: "Re: 2.4 and 2G File Limit?"
Previous message: Martin Frey: "Mmaping vmallocated memory to user space"
In reply to: Alexander Viro: "Re: supermount (was Re: Floppy handling)"
Next in thread: Alexander Viro: "Re: supermount (was Re: Floppy handling)"
Reply: Alexander Viro: "Re: supermount (was Re: Floppy handling)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 10 2000 - 16:34:15 EDT