> How can 2.95.2 possibly be considered bleeding edge? And why should we
> be forced to be stuck with old, obsolete compilers and utilities for
> compiling our kernel? Shouldn't forward progress in the kernel include
> supporting current stable compilers, like 2.95.2? Just because it's a
Both 2.95.2 and egcs 1.* miscompile some setups on x86 with Linux 2.4.0test
(strstr stuff notable). A couple of drivers dont seem to work with 2.95 (driver
bugs)
> little more ANSI compliant than previous compilers shouldn't stop us
> from using it.
its nothing to do with ansi compliance. gcc 2.95 is a bit more flexible about
some gnu extensions. The fact 2.7.2 doesnt work with test2 is just a bug, its
one of those you never catch until someone using 2.7.2 builds the tree, then
you hear loudly about it 8)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 24 2000 - 18:37:55 EDT