Re: console_lock too early in printk???

From: David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Date: Fri Jun 30 2000 - 23:48:30 EDT

Next message: Paul Barton-Davis: "Re: linux-kernel-digest V1 #1076"

Previous message: Paul Barton-Davis: "Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux"
In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: console_lock too early in printk???"
Next in thread: Chris Lattner: "Re: console_lock too early in printk???"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2000 12:45:23 +1000
From: Andrew Morton <andrewm@uow.edu.au>

This means that we're delivering a signal from within a softirq.

TCP sends signals from softirqs all the time.

Later,
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Paul Barton-Davis: "Re: linux-kernel-digest V1 #1076"
Previous message: Paul Barton-Davis: "Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux"
In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: console_lock too early in printk???"
Next in thread: Chris Lattner: "Re: console_lock too early in printk???"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jul 01 2000 - 00:02:25 EDT