Re: Patch: 2.4.0-test3 still had some current->priority references

From: Albert D. Cahalan (acahalan@cs.uml.edu)
Date: Tue Jul 11 2000 - 03:30:31 EDT

  • Next message: t.n.vanderleeuw@chello.nl: "[PATCH] Re: Compile Errors on 2.4.0-test3 final"

    Adam J. Richter writes:

    > In 2.4.0-test3, task_struct->priority became task_struct->nice,
    > and the number stored in the field changed, apparently according to
    > the following relationship:
    >
    > task_struct->nice = 20 - task_struct->priority;
    >
    > Also, the bounds appear to be different. task_struct->priority
    > ranged from 0..40 (41 possible values), while task_struct->nice
    > ranges from -20 to 19 (40 possible values). So, priority=0 maps
    > to nice=19.

    It sure would be nice to have seen the original change mentioned
    on linux-kernel for all to see. I dearly hope userspace isn't going
    to care about the loss of a value.

    May I assume that /proc has been fully adjusted so procps will
    be happy? I've fallen behind in reading kernel patches.

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 11 2000 - 03:35:41 EDT