Re: Result of compiling with `-W'

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Thu Jul 13 2000 - 12:12:37 EDT

Next message: Hans Reiser: "Re: [Announce] BKL shifting into drivers and filesystems - beware"

Previous message: Anton Blanchard: "Re: 2.4.0-test4-pre6: Build failure in sunlance.c"
In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: Result of compiling with `-W'"
Next in thread: willy@thepuffingroup.com: "Re: Result of compiling with `-W'"
Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: Result of compiling with `-W'"
Reply: willy@thepuffingroup.com: "Re: Result of compiling with `-W'"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> > I think your patch should be checked
> > carefully because this will not be the only place where it happens.
>
> Yes, I've already asked Linus to review this change and the ipc/shm.c
> one - they're actually API changes.

The rlimit one is wrong. Resource limits are unsigned on x86.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Hans Reiser: "Re: [Announce] BKL shifting into drivers and filesystems - beware"
Previous message: Anton Blanchard: "Re: 2.4.0-test4-pre6: Build failure in sunlance.c"
In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: Result of compiling with `-W'"
Next in thread: willy@thepuffingroup.com: "Re: Result of compiling with `-W'"
Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: Result of compiling with `-W'"
Reply: willy@thepuffingroup.com: "Re: Result of compiling with `-W'"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 13 2000 - 14:37:28 EDT