Re: Multithreaded TCP/IP stack

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Thu Jul 13 2000 - 18:55:25 EDT

Next message: André Dahlqvist: "Re: Linux-2.4.0-test4 (was Re: [Announce] BKL shifting into drivers and"

Previous message: Horst von Brand: "Re: [Announce] BKL shifting into drivers and filesystems - beware"
In reply to: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: Multithreaded TCP/IP stack"
Next in thread: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: Multithreaded TCP/IP stack"
Next in thread: Jeff V. Merkey: "Re: Multithreaded TCP/IP stack"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> I don't know if this is true -- but under high network load, Solaris
> (2.6) does appear to perform better than Linux 2.2.x last time I
> looked into this.

What people I think are trying to talk about is scalability. And yes when
you look at 2.2 SMP both Solaris and NT generally scale better on high network
loads to user space

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: André Dahlqvist: "Re: Linux-2.4.0-test4 (was Re: [Announce] BKL shifting into drivers and"
Previous message: Horst von Brand: "Re: [Announce] BKL shifting into drivers and filesystems - beware"
In reply to: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: Multithreaded TCP/IP stack"
Next in thread: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: Multithreaded TCP/IP stack"
Next in thread: Jeff V. Merkey: "Re: Multithreaded TCP/IP stack"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 13 2000 - 19:06:17 EDT