Re: UDMA on WDC == (Re: 2.4.0-test4 Corrupt filesystems)

From: Roger Larsson (roger.larsson@norran.net)
Date: Fri Jul 14 2000 - 06:40:51 EDT

Next message: Bjorn Wesen: "Re: Do ramdisk exec's map direct to buffer cache?"

Previous message: Andi Kleen: "Re: Multithreaded TCP/IP stack"
In reply to: Andre Hedrick: "UDMA on WDC == (Re: 2.4.0-test4 Corrupt filesystems)"
Next in thread: Cy: "RE: UDMA on WDC == (Re: 2.4.0-test4 Corrupt filesystems)"
Reply: Cy: "RE: UDMA on WDC == (Re: 2.4.0-test4 Corrupt filesystems)"
Reply: Andre Hedrick: "Re: UDMA on WDC == (Re: 2.4.0-test4 Corrupt filesystems)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Andre Hedrick wrote:
>
> On Thu, 13 Jul 2000, Cy wrote:
>
> > Asus MES-N - beta bios version 1006.02
> > Celeron 433
> > 64MB memory
> > Western Digital WD205AA
>
> How many FS's have to die before people quit trying to do UltraDMA on WDC
> drives?
>

Read something at WDC site about this, summary:
- Newer disks should be ok.
- AC22100H are dependent on revision...

/RogerL

-- Home page: http://www.norran.net/nra02596/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Bjorn Wesen: "Re: Do ramdisk exec's map direct to buffer cache?"
Previous message: Andi Kleen: "Re: Multithreaded TCP/IP stack"
In reply to: Andre Hedrick: "UDMA on WDC == (Re: 2.4.0-test4 Corrupt filesystems)"
Next in thread: Cy: "RE: UDMA on WDC == (Re: 2.4.0-test4 Corrupt filesystems)"
Reply: Cy: "RE: UDMA on WDC == (Re: 2.4.0-test4 Corrupt filesystems)"
Reply: Andre Hedrick: "Re: UDMA on WDC == (Re: 2.4.0-test4 Corrupt filesystems)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jul 14 2000 - 06:58:34 EDT