Re: UDMA on WDC == (Re: 2.4.0-test4 Corrupt filesystems)

From: Andre Hedrick (andre@linux-ide.org)
Date: Fri Jul 14 2000 - 11:04:29 EDT

  • Next message: Henning P. Schmiedehausen: "Re: SIGSEGV on fclose"

    Until they prove it and I have an ata-analyser to observe the traces, I
    will not believe them. You know it is funny what you get to here and know
    when you are a full voting member of NCITS-T13-AT-Attachemnt Standards
    Committee. I believe the folks that I work with on the committee.
    I also asked WDC point blank about the issue, and got a NOP answer.

    They know that all they have to do is call me on my cell and tehy will get
    me. So unless you are with WDC and will make a public counter statement
    to the facts and submit proof, web-propaganda does not cut it for me.

    Cheers,

    On Fri, 14 Jul 2000, Roger Larsson wrote:

    > Andre Hedrick wrote:
    > >
    > > On Thu, 13 Jul 2000, Cy wrote:
    > >
    > > > Asus MES-N - beta bios version 1006.02
    > > > Celeron 433
    > > > 64MB memory
    > > > Western Digital WD205AA
    > >
    > > How many FS's have to die before people quit trying to do UltraDMA on WDC
    > > drives?
    > >
    >
    > Read something at WDC site about this, summary:
    > - Newer disks should be ok.
    > - AC22100H are dependent on revision...
    >
    > /RogerL
    >
    > --
    > Home page:
    > http://www.norran.net/nra02596/
    >

    Andre Hedrick
    The Linux ATA/IDE guy

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jul 14 2000 - 11:08:32 EDT