Re: gcc-2.7.2.3 warnings [PATCH]

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Fri Jul 14 2000 - 19:53:49 EDT

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Comments wanted: Linux/i386 boot protocol doc"

Previous message: Matthew Wilcox: "Re: PATCH 2.4.0.4.6: workaround for BUG() in slab.c"
In reply to: Richard Gooch: "Re: gcc-2.7.2.3 warnings [PATCH]"
Next in thread: Richard Gooch: "Re: gcc-2.7.2.3 warnings [PATCH]"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: gcc-2.7.2.3 warnings [PATCH]"
Reply: Richard Gooch: "Re: gcc-2.7.2.3 warnings [PATCH]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Aha! Now I know what compiler you're using. Is there general agreement
> in the cabal that gcc-2.91.66 is Good[tm]?

Except for some uses of strstr() it miscompiles yes, but then so does 2.95
With that non inlined all should be well

> > If it makes any difference, I'd be inclined to just make gcc-2.7.2 a
> > compiler non grata..

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Comments wanted: Linux/i386 boot protocol doc"
Previous message: Matthew Wilcox: "Re: PATCH 2.4.0.4.6: workaround for BUG() in slab.c"
In reply to: Richard Gooch: "Re: gcc-2.7.2.3 warnings [PATCH]"
Next in thread: Richard Gooch: "Re: gcc-2.7.2.3 warnings [PATCH]"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: gcc-2.7.2.3 warnings [PATCH]"
Reply: Richard Gooch: "Re: gcc-2.7.2.3 warnings [PATCH]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jul 14 2000 - 20:04:34 EDT