Re: Comments wanted: Linux/i386 boot protocol doc

From: H. Peter Anvin (hpa@transmeta.com)
Date: Fri Jul 14 2000 - 20:15:21 EDT

  • Next message: Rik van Riel: "Re: [Announce] BKL shifting into drivers and filesystems - beware"

    Alan Cox wrote:
    >
    > > | Reserved for BIOS | Do not use. Reserved for BIOS EBDA.
    > > 09A000 +------------------------+
    >
    > 9A000 is not a guaranteed address. The EBDA is defined by reading a low memory
    > value

    I know, and I address that in the document. Boot protocol 2.02 plus
    bzImage allows the boot loader the flexibility to set the memory ceiling
    quite low. However, we needed a "drop dead" address for existing
    kernels as well, and John, Hans and I came up with 0x9A000 as being
    something we can reasonably do. It is not always sufficient -- when
    using M-systems flash or PXE the EBDA is several hundred K in size.
    There is no way to support this with the old kernels which require
    mucking with the 0x90000 segment. Hence the revised protocol.

    However, I'll see if I can add a note.

    The problem is that most of these are hard limits for the boot loader --
    doing INT 12h to find out the ceiling only allows you to print an error
    message instead of crashing.

            -hpa

    -- 
    <hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
    "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
    http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt
    

    - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jul 14 2000 - 20:21:00 EDT