Re: devfs question

From: Martin Costabel (costabel@wanadoo.fr)
Date: Sat Jul 15 2000 - 13:22:16 EDT

  • Next message: Pablo Baena: "Re: [MAYBE NOT SO] Bug on lp.o? on kernel-2.2.15"

    John Covici wrote:
    >
    > Hi. I was reading the readme in the 2.4.0-test2 kernel documentation
    > tree for defs when I ran into the following mysterious passage
    >
    > /etc/securetty
    > PAM (Pluggable Authentication Modules) is supposed to be a flexible
    > mechanism for providing better user authentication and access to
    > services. Unfortunately, it's also fragile, complex and undocumented
    > (check out RedHat 6.1, and probably other distributions as well). PAM
    > has problems with symbolic links. Append the following lines to your
    > /etc/securetty file:
    >
    > 1
    > 2
    > 3
    > 4
    > 5
    > 6
    > 7
    > 8
    >
    > What does this mean since /etc/security is a directory and where
    > shhould these lines go anyway?

    Isn't that obsolete anyway? The devfs documentation does not always
    follow the devfs API changes. In any case, if I want to login as root, I
    have to put

    vc/1
    vc/2

    and so on into /etc/securetty.

    --
    Martin
    

    - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jul 15 2000 - 15:45:17 EDT