Re: RLIM_INFINITY inconsistency between archs

From: Linus Torvalds (torvalds@transmeta.com)
Date: Thu Jul 27 2000 - 11:59:53 EDT

  • Next message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: status page?"

    On Thu, 27 Jul 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
    >
    > What I mean is that the above generation-script should be generated
    > _once_. The source gets distributed with the generated file, so that
    > whatever happens you at least get reliable results in a reasonably
    > heterogenous environment.

    Put another way that maybe is a clearer example:

     - when I download the binary rpm of package "foo-2.3.5.rpm", should I
       really have to care on what machine it was compiled?

    A lot of old-time UNIX people seem to think that everybody compiles
    sources themselves. That's madness. Yes, it's important that you _can_.
    But you shouldn't have to. If I hear that the new feature 2.3.5 of package
    "foo" supports the new filesystem layout that I've been waiting for,
    should I have to pray that the person who compiled the binary happened to
    use one of the development kernels where that feature was actually
    implemented?

    Or should I have to recompile it myself to make sure?

    Or, wonder of wonders, should it just WORK?

    I think the latter. And I hope I've made clear to everybody why a software
    package must NOT EVER depend on what kernel version happened to be
    installed when it was compiled. And why it is so _important_ that nobody
    even by mistake does this. EVER.

    The defense rests.

                    Linus

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 12:05:33 EDT