Re: [PATCH] Decrease hash table memory overhead

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Fri Jul 28 2000 - 17:42:59 EDT

  • Next message: Moritz Schulte: "Re: lots of segmentation faults ... why ? (fwd)"

    > On Fri, 28 Jul 2000, Andi Kleen wrote:
    > >
    > > This saves about 96K memory on my 128MB machine, more on machines with
    > > bigger ram.
    >
    > I'd rather have just one list function than save a few kB of RAM. Avoid
    > confusion, and make people so used to that one list-handling functionalty
    > that bugs don't crop up as easily.

    100Kb is not what I'd call a small amount of ram. Linux 0.12 probably fitted
    into it

    Alan

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jul 30 2000 - 05:08:03 EDT