Philipp Rumpf wrote:
>
> > This _should_ be arch-independent, but there is one potential
>
> What's the point ? The assembly isn't architecture-independent anyway.
The generation of the symbols is arch-independent. The ksyms.c bit.
> See arch/mips/tools/offset.c.
Yes, a two-pass approach is OK.
> I think it would be a better idea to generate the offsets automatically
> and possibly in an architecture-independent way without falling back to
> using symbols.
Whatever.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Aug 05 2000 - 00:42:08 EDT