Re: 2.4.0-test6-pre2 has a (buffercache?) lockup

From: James Lewis Nance (jlnance@intrex.net)
Date: Sat Aug 05 2000 - 06:58:59 EDT

Next message: Pavel Machek: "Re: Does 2.4test kapmd replace apmd?"

Previous message: marcel.lanz@ds9.ch: "Re: since 2.4.0-testx my printer won't run"
In reply to: Alexander Viro: "Re: 2.4.0-test6-pre2 has a (buffercache?) lockup"
Next in thread: Tigran Aivazian: "Re: 2.4.0-test6-pre2 has a (buffercache?) lockup"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Aug 04, 2000 at 09:23:33PM -0400, Alexander Viro wrote:
>
> OK, folks, could those who had lockups on -pre2 try the following patch?
> Bug hits if you are adding a directly-addressed block (either data or
> indirect one; it must be addressed from i_data) to inode in the first
> cylinder group on a filesystem that has zero ->s_first_data_block.

This fixed my problems.

Thanks!

Jim

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Pavel Machek: "Re: Does 2.4test kapmd replace apmd?"
Previous message: marcel.lanz@ds9.ch: "Re: since 2.4.0-testx my printer won't run"
In reply to: Alexander Viro: "Re: 2.4.0-test6-pre2 has a (buffercache?) lockup"
Next in thread: Tigran Aivazian: "Re: 2.4.0-test6-pre2 has a (buffercache?) lockup"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Aug 05 2000 - 07:00:12 EDT