Re: 2.4.0-test6-pre2 has a (buffercache?) lockup

From: Tigran Aivazian (tigran@veritas.com)
Date: Sat Aug 05 2000 - 07:55:53 EDT

Next message: Frank van Maarseveen: "Re: 2.2.* kernels w/ glibc-2.1.* allowing ngroups_max to be > 128?"

Previous message: Pavel Machek: "Re: Does 2.4test kapmd replace apmd?"
In reply to: Alexander Viro: "Re: 2.4.0-test6-pre2 has a (buffercache?) lockup"
Next in thread: Bill Maidment: "Re: 2.4.0-test6-pre2 has a (buffercache?) lockup"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, 4 Aug 2000, Alexander Viro wrote:
> OK, folks, could those who had lockups on -pre2 try the following patch?

Amazing - I missed (unintentionally it was 1am!) an important detail - it
always hits in the same place because I always re-mke2fs the filesystem I
was extracting the tape onto but you spotted that it is ext2-related
anyway.

Now, in 2.4.0-test6-pre5 it doesn't lockup anymore but your patch doesn't
apply either (assuming because a slightly different incarnation thereof is
already there).

Thank you for fixing this!

Regards,
Tigran

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Frank van Maarseveen: "Re: 2.2.* kernels w/ glibc-2.1.* allowing ngroups_max to be > 128?"
Previous message: Pavel Machek: "Re: Does 2.4test kapmd replace apmd?"
In reply to: Alexander Viro: "Re: 2.4.0-test6-pre2 has a (buffercache?) lockup"
Next in thread: Bill Maidment: "Re: 2.4.0-test6-pre2 has a (buffercache?) lockup"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Aug 05 2000 - 07:51:09 EDT