RE: 2.4.0-test6-pre2 has a (buffercache?) lockup

From: Dunlap, Randy (randy.dunlap@intel.com)
Date: Sat Aug 05 2000 - 16:34:50 EDT

Next message: Shawn Starr: "Re: [Fwd: ScanMail Message: To Sender, sensitive content found and action taken.]"

Previous message: Thomas Molina: "where should EXPORT_SYMBOLs go in 2.4.0test6-pre5?"
Maybe in reply to: Tigran Aivazian: "2.4.0-test6-pre2 has a (buffercache?) lockup"
Next in thread: Alexander Viro: "RE: 2.4.0-test6-pre2 has a (buffercache?) lockup"
Reply: Alexander Viro: "RE: 2.4.0-test6-pre2 has a (buffercache?) lockup"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> OK, folks, could those who had lockups on -pre2 try the
> following patch?
> Bug hits if you are adding a directly-addressed block (either data or
> indirect one; it must be addressed from i_data) to inode in the first
> cylinder group on a filesystem that has zero ->s_first_data_block.

My test5-preX boot hang has to be a different failure so this
patch didn't help me like it did some other people.

Mine always occurs (hangs) during "Bringing up interface lo"
(RH 6.0 scripts). How can I debug this?

~Randy

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Shawn Starr: "Re: [Fwd: ScanMail Message: To Sender, sensitive content found and action taken.]"
Previous message: Thomas Molina: "where should EXPORT_SYMBOLs go in 2.4.0test6-pre5?"
Maybe in reply to: Tigran Aivazian: "2.4.0-test6-pre2 has a (buffercache?) lockup"
Next in thread: Alexander Viro: "RE: 2.4.0-test6-pre2 has a (buffercache?) lockup"
Reply: Alexander Viro: "RE: 2.4.0-test6-pre2 has a (buffercache?) lockup"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Aug 05 2000 - 16:39:52 EDT