Re: df -k shows WRONG information

From: Tigran Aivazian (tigran@veritas.com)
Date: Tue Aug 29 2000 - 17:25:47 EDT

  • Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: [patch] scheduler bugfix, SMP, 2.4.0-test7"

    Hi,

    (removed linux-smp as irrelevant)

    sorry, I haven't read your message but 99.99% of claims that "df
    doesn't work" originate from people who don't suspect about old good
    minroot thing, i.e. check out -m option of mke2fs(8) command.

    Regards,
    Tigran

    On Mon, 28 Aug 2000, Joe wrote:

    > FYI: I am sending this to both SMP and kernel as I have an SMP
    > machine. I don't know if there is a list for the ext2 filesystem
    > as I suspect that is where the problem is/was.
    >
    > Machine 'Dual' 233MMX with 128 Meg of RAM. Kernel 2.2.14, WD
    > 6Gig drive as hdb, Seagate 2.1 as hda. Linux is on hdb.
    >
    > Last night I did an rm -f on 4 files. The files sizes were 35M,
    > 390M, 250M, and 150M. After doing this I did a df -k. df -k
    > showed me having used 68 percent of my hard drive. So I then
    > did a du -s /* to see why. A few days earlier I had only used
    > 32% and had not installed ANYTHING.
    > du -s showed a file that was 2.6 Gig. It was .xsession-errors.
    > I then did an rm -f on this file.
    >
    > I again did a df -k and it still showed 68 percent of my disk
    > being used. So I repeated the du -s /*. This time du -s and df
    > -k did not add up. When I added up the output from du -s I had
    > about 35 % of my disk used.
    >
    > I rebooted the system, (windows thinking that this would help.)
    > It did not. du -s and df -k still showed different amounts of
    > disk spaced being used. I then did a full shutdown and waited a
    > few minutes then restarted. For some reason this time it told
    > me my disk was corrupt, and it ran fsck. After this completed
    > and I logged in, I did a df -k and it now showed 35% being used.
    >
    > I thought that you all should know that this happened and do not
    > know if it had something to do with smp or what part of the
    > kernel as I am NOT a kernel programmer.
    >
    > My only guess is that the pointers to these files got removed
    > but the kernel /fs never removed some internel pointer or some
    > reference to this data somewhere???
    >
    > thanks Joe
    >
    >
    >
    > __________________________________________________
    > Do You Yahoo!?
    > Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere!
    > http://mail.yahoo.com/
    > -
    > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-smp" in
    > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    >

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 29 2000 - 17:19:33 EDT