2.2.16 & unresolved symbols in modules

From: Dmitry Brodsky (dima@cs.ubc.ca)
Date: Wed Aug 30 2000 - 03:44:32 EDT

Next message: Morris Chen: "If loadable modules are covered by Linux GPL?"

Previous message: Alexander Viro: "Re: hfs support for blocksize != 512"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.2.16 & unresolved symbols in modules"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.2.16 & unresolved symbols in modules"
Reply: justin: "Re: 2.2.16 & unresolved symbols in modules"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi,

All the module in 2.2.16 seem to have unresolved symbols, eg all of
them have printk unresolved. Is there a fix for that?

Thanks
Dima

-- 
Dima Brodsky                                   dima@cs.ubc.ca
                                               http://www.cs.ubc.ca/~dima
201-2366 Main Mall                             (604) 822-6179 (Office)
Department of Computer Science                 (604) 822-2895 (DSG Lab)
University of British Columbia, Canada         (604) 822-5485 (FAX)
Computers are like Old Testament gods; lots of rules and no mercy.
							  (Joseph Campbell)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Morris Chen: "If loadable modules are covered by Linux GPL?"
Previous message: Alexander Viro: "Re: hfs support for blocksize != 512"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.2.16 & unresolved symbols in modules"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.2.16 & unresolved symbols in modules"
Reply: justin: "Re: 2.2.16 & unresolved symbols in modules"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 30 2000 - 03:46:36 EDT