Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz

• Previous message: Jack M.: "ramdisk driver source code"
• In reply to: Keith Owens: "Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz"
• Next in thread: Chris Ricker: "Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz"
• Next in thread: Michael Elizabeth Chastain: "Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 11:49:34AM +1100, Keith Owens wrote:
> Before Rusty tells me that not everybody uses modules,
> /lib/modules/<version> can exist even if the kernel has no modules, it
> just needs a simple Makefile change. Think of /lib/modules/<version>
> as a standard place to store information about kernel <version>.

I think it was HPA who proposed renaming /lib/modules to /lib/kernel in
anticipation of it being used for more things. this would certainly seem
like a good idea if you're going to put the .config there as well.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Gregory T. Norris: "2.4.0-test7 lockup"
• Previous message: Jack M.: "ramdisk driver source code"
• In reply to: Keith Owens: "Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz"
• Next in thread: Chris Ricker: "Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz"
• Next in thread: Michael Elizabeth Chastain: "Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 30 2000 - 21:15:22 EDT