Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz

From: Chip Salzenberg (chip@valinux.com)
Date: Thu Aug 31 2000 - 18:47:51 EDT

Next message: Greg Hennessy: "Re: 2T for i386"

Previous message: Trond Myklebust: "Re: [NFS] [PATCH] Re: grow_inodes: inode-max limit reached - how to find/fix the inode leak?"
In reply to: Paul Gortmaker: "Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz"
Next in thread: Pavel Machek: "Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz"
Next in thread: Arjan van de Ven: "Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

According to Paul Gortmaker:
> (things marked as not set or modular aren't relevant to the zImage)

True, but reconstructing the (b)zImage isn't the only purpose of
keeping a config file around. So I'd rather keep the modular
settings. But maybe that's just me.

-- 
Chip Salzenberg              - a.k.a. -              <chip@valinux.com>
"I wanted to play hopscotch with the impenetrable mystery of existence,
    but he stepped in a wormhole and had to go in early."  // MST3K
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Greg Hennessy: "Re: 2T for i386"
Previous message: Trond Myklebust: "Re: [NFS] [PATCH] Re: grow_inodes: inode-max limit reached - how to find/fix the inode leak?"
In reply to: Paul Gortmaker: "Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz"
Next in thread: Pavel Machek: "Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz"
Next in thread: Arjan van de Ven: "Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 31 2000 - 18:50:57 EDT