Re: Large File support and blocks.

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Fri Sep 01 2000 - 12:29:04 EDT

Next message: Daniel Phillips: "512 byte magic multiplier (was: Large File support and blocks)"

Previous message: Pavel Machek: "Re: SCO: "thread creation is about a thousand times faster than on"
In reply to: Linda Walsh: "RE: Large File support and blocks."
Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: Large File support and blocks."
Next in thread: Matti Aarnio: "Re: Large File support and blocks."
Next in thread: Richard B. Johnson: "RE: Large File support and blocks."
Reply: Rik van Riel: "Re: Large File support and blocks."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> With all the talk about bugs and slowness on a 386/486/586 -- does anyone
> think those platforms will have multi-T disks hooked up to them?

Yes. The poor handling of 64bit numbers hasnt gone away on PentiumII or Athlon
as far as I can tell

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Daniel Phillips: "512 byte magic multiplier (was: Large File support and blocks)"
Previous message: Pavel Machek: "Re: SCO: "thread creation is about a thousand times faster than on"
In reply to: Linda Walsh: "RE: Large File support and blocks."
Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: Large File support and blocks."
Next in thread: Matti Aarnio: "Re: Large File support and blocks."
Next in thread: Richard B. Johnson: "RE: Large File support and blocks."
Reply: Rik van Riel: "Re: Large File support and blocks."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 01 2000 - 12:44:08 EDT