Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad

From: Chris Evans (chris@scary.beasts.org)
Date: Fri Sep 01 2000 - 16:04:30 EDT

Next message: Rasmus Andersen: "[patchlet] Removing unneeded line in vmtruncate() (2.4.0-t8p1)"

Previous message: TimO: "Re: Press release - here we go again!"
In reply to: Rik van Riel: "Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad"
Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad"
Reply: Rik van Riel: "Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:

> On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
>
> > Any of you tried copying a 2G file in the same (ext2)
> > filesystem? It starts swapping like mad and generally behaves
> > indecently, despite the huge 1024M of RAM it has.
>
> http://www.surriel.com/patches/2.4.0-t8p1-vmpatch2
>
> I'm working on these issues and seem to be pretty close
> to having fixed most of them now...

Got any of the standard benchmarks (bonnie?) for us to drool over? :-)

Cheers
Chris

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Rasmus Andersen: "[patchlet] Removing unneeded line in vmtruncate() (2.4.0-t8p1)"
Previous message: TimO: "Re: Press release - here we go again!"
In reply to: Rik van Riel: "Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad"
Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad"
Reply: Rik van Riel: "Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 01 2000 - 16:05:52 EDT