Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/

From: Jamie Lokier (lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk)
Date: Sat Sep 02 2000 - 08:48:38 EDT

Next message: Stefan Becker: "(no subject)"

Previous message: Graham Murray: "Re: www.crucial.com won't talk to 2.4.0-test7 system"
In reply to: Richard Gooch: "Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/"
Next in thread: Richard Gooch: "Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/"
Next in thread: Tigran Aivazian: "Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/"
Reply: Richard Gooch: "Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Richard Gooch wrote:
> I agree. Firstly, you can't frob random memory with the MTRR driver,
> so it clearly doesn't need CAP_SYS_RAWIO.

With it you can change the behaviour of other drivers by changing the
properties of their MMIO space. So it should need CAP_SYS_RAWIO, IMHO.

-- Jamie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Stefan Becker: "(no subject)"
Previous message: Graham Murray: "Re: www.crucial.com won't talk to 2.4.0-test7 system"
In reply to: Richard Gooch: "Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/"
Next in thread: Richard Gooch: "Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/"
Next in thread: Tigran Aivazian: "Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/"
Reply: Richard Gooch: "Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 02 2000 - 08:57:17 EDT