dean gaudet wrote:
> an example of brokenness in the traditional fd API is close-on-exec --
> there's a race between open()/socket()/pipe() and fcntl(FD_CLOEXEC) during
> which if another thread does a fork() it's possible the child will inherit
> an fd it shouldn't... working around it is painful. the model which
> NT/OS2 use for creating a new process scales better in the 99.99% case of
> stdin/out/err -- you only specify those fds you want to keep in the new
> process.
An obvious solution presents itself. O_CLOEXEC.
Glibc could easily be made to call fcntl(FD_CLOEXEC) for kernels that
don't implement O_CLOEXEC, so that applications can simply use the flag
and rely on it.
-- Jamie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 02 2000 - 09:40:19 EDT