Re: Linux 2.2 - BSD/OS 4.1 ARP incompatibility

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Sat Sep 02 2000 - 12:10:19 EDT

Next message: John Levon: "Drivers that don't reset TASK_{UN}INTERRUPTIBLE in loops"

Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: www.crucial.com won't talk to 2.4.0-test7 system"
In reply to: Matthew Kirkwood: "Re: Linux 2.2 - BSD/OS 4.1 ARP incompatibility"
Next in thread: Andi Kleen: "Re: Linux 2.2 - BSD/OS 4.1 ARP incompatibility"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> I see the point, but it bites sufficiently often that I don't
> understand why there is no interesting in improving this
> behaviour.

For a large number of scenarios it makes vastly more sense.

> With both interfaces up, it's impossible to apply anti-martian
> rules to the interfaces, since it's hard to predict which card
> will answer an ARP request.

/proc/sys/net/ipv4/.../hidden

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: John Levon: "Drivers that don't reset TASK_{UN}INTERRUPTIBLE in loops"
Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: www.crucial.com won't talk to 2.4.0-test7 system"
In reply to: Matthew Kirkwood: "Re: Linux 2.2 - BSD/OS 4.1 ARP incompatibility"
Next in thread: Andi Kleen: "Re: Linux 2.2 - BSD/OS 4.1 ARP incompatibility"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 02 2000 - 12:20:11 EDT