Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating Rik's VM now?

From: Linus Torvalds (torvalds@transmeta.com)
Date: Sat Sep 02 2000 - 14:55:00 EDT

Next message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: error in arch/i386/kernel/ptrace.c (subtle)"

Previous message: brian@worldcontrol.com: "Stuck at 1GB again"
In reply to: Rik van Riel: "Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating Rik's VM now?"
Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating Rik's VM now?"
Reply: Rik van Riel: "Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating Rik's VM now?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> Not really. I'm not aware of any bug with my VM that doesn't
> occur in the standard VM too.

So what happened with the BUG() thing that you had? I never saw any
resolution to that, and that certainly didn't happen with the standard VM.

Linus

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: error in arch/i386/kernel/ptrace.c (subtle)"
Previous message: brian@worldcontrol.com: "Stuck at 1GB again"
In reply to: Rik van Riel: "Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating Rik's VM now?"
Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating Rik's VM now?"
Reply: Rik van Riel: "Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating Rik's VM now?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 02 2000 - 15:02:44 EDT