Re: www.crucial.com won't talk to 2.4.0-test7 system

From: David Ford (david@kalifornia.com)
Date: Sat Sep 02 2000 - 15:14:58 EDT

  • Next message: David Ford: "Re: www.crucial.com won't talk to 2.4.0-test7 system"

    So make noise. I tried a post at /. but it wasn't accepted. We have power
    in our [tiny] voices when used enmasse.

    -d

    Graham Murray wrote:

    > David Ford <david@kalifornia.com> writes:
    >
    > > There are a -lot- of large sites that give us issues like this.
    >
    > What is the best way to handle sites which block connections using
    > ECN? Is it best for everyone who detects this to write individually to
    > each site which they find can be accessed with "echo 0 >
    > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn" but not (in the default state) of tcp_ecn
    > = 1? Or is there some better way to spread the word more "officially"?
    >
    > So far I have written to every site which I have been unable to
    > access with ECN enabled, but the only response (apart from
    > auto-responders acknowledging the receipt of the email) I have had has
    > said that the matter has been forwarded to the site's IT department.
    > -
    > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    --
    "The difference between 'involvement' and 'commitment' is like an
    eggs-and-ham breakfast: the chicken was 'involved' - the pig was
    'committed'."
    


    - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 02 2000 - 15:21:29 EDT