Re: [PATCH] ISAPNP using an invalid IO_APIC IRQ

From: M.H.VanLeeuwen (vanl@megsinet.net)
Date: Sat Sep 23 2000 - 10:59:12 EDT

Next message: safemode: "Problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM"

Previous message: Chris Ricker: "Re: Given an image, how can show its config?"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] ISAPNP using an invalid IO_APIC IRQ"
Next in thread: M.H.VanLeeuwen: "Re: [PATCH] ISAPNP using an invalid IO_APIC IRQ"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Alan Cox wrote:
>
> IRQ 5 may well have gone to an onboard device.
>
> There are two things to note here:
>
> 1. By default if you boot with non PnP OS the BIOS will assign IRQ's
> to PnP devices and we would be best to try and keep the existing value when
> possible (so the PCI/ISA routing is correct)

Yes, when I tell the BIOS that the OS is not PnP aware it assigns IRQ 9 to NIC,
yet Linux tries to assign it to IRQ 5.

Martin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: safemode: "Problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM"
Previous message: Chris Ricker: "Re: Given an image, how can show its config?"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] ISAPNP using an invalid IO_APIC IRQ"
Next in thread: M.H.VanLeeuwen: "Re: [PATCH] ISAPNP using an invalid IO_APIC IRQ"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 23 2000 - 10:57:25 EDT