Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM

From: David Ford (david@kalifornia.com)
Date: Sat Sep 23 2000 - 13:54:08 EDT

  • Next message: David Ford: "Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM"

    XFree86 Version 4.0.1b / X Window System
    (protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6400)
    Release Date: 11 August 2000

    =)

    Are you by chance using cvs X from after september 10th? If so, hop on the
    xpert@xfree86.org mailing list and post your comments there. There is another
    gentlemen with a similar problem. I'm changing pace here, I believe the kernel is
    fine and it is an X issue as it occurs on 2.2 as well. Visit the tail of:
    http://www.xfree86.org/pipermail/xpert/2000-September/thread.html.

    -d

    safemode wrote:

    > When in doubt. . Blame it on the biggest piece of crap around .. X. One can
    > say using a cvs of X is the cause of this by somehow i doubt it would matter. X
    > needs a sane make system and i'll bet 10:1 that it's the root of this shm usage.
    > But it should not be crashing the OS ...which does occur since i just went down a
    > couple minutes ago. Right now it's increasing 1 segment a second it seems. it's
    > at 1200 now and i give it about 30 more minutes before i crash again. I'm gonna
    > run this on the test8-vm3 patched kernel i had before that was VERY good except
    > for that deadlock problem that caused me to crash after 7 days. If the shm usage
    > is insane on that then i'll believe it is X's fault. be back with the results
    > in a few minutes.

    --
          "There is a natural aristocracy among men. The grounds of this are
          virtue and talents", Thomas Jefferson [1742-1826], 3rd US President
    


    - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 23 2000 - 13:55:50 EDT