Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM

From: David Ford (david@kalifornia.com)
Date: Sat Sep 23 2000 - 15:01:49 EDT

Next message: Henrik Størner: "Munging reply-to headers etc. (was: Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM)"

Previous message: Alan Cox: "Linux 2.2.18pre10"
In reply to: safemode: "Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM"
Next in thread: safemode: "Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM"
Next in thread: safemode: "Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM"
Reply: safemode: "Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

safemode wrote:

> i'll get back about the latest xfree86 in about 2 hours .. but if anyone has any other ideas
> or info i can give ...it's not problem. test8 seems stable enough to keep itself up until
> i'm ready to reboot.

I should hope, I have a 20 day uptime so far.

-d

-- "There is a natural aristocracy among men. The grounds of this are virtue and talents", Thomas Jefferson [1742-1826], 3rd US President

text/x-vcard attachment: Card for David Ford

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Henrik Størner: "Munging reply-to headers etc. (was: Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM)"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Linux 2.2.18pre10"
In reply to: safemode: "Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM"
Next in thread: safemode: "Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM"
Next in thread: safemode: "Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM"
Reply: safemode: "Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 23 2000 - 15:04:13 EDT