Re: Problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM

• Previous message: Mike Klar: "[PATCH] mkdep mishandles apostrophes in // comments"
• Maybe in reply to: safemode: "Problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM"
• Next in thread: safemode: "Re: Problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM"
• Reply: safemode: "Re: Problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM"
• Reply: David Ford: "Re: Problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Ok, compiling using a cvs of X i got a couple hours ago, I'm just
wondering what the average segment number is for SHM on an X session
that has been up for a while .... i'll get back with any sort of info
on if the SHM problem has been solved with this latest CVS or if it
continues to look like a kernel SHM problem. So far though,
2.4.0-test8-vm3 is handling the problem Quite well as opposed to test9,
which died in 2 hours upon booting ...and it didn't have the added
stress of compiling X.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: mlist@opinionz.cjb.net: "BTTV Driver under 2.2.18preX bug"
• Previous message: Mike Klar: "[PATCH] mkdep mishandles apostrophes in // comments"
• Maybe in reply to: safemode: "Problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM"
• Next in thread: safemode: "Re: Problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM"
• Reply: safemode: "Re: Problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM"
• Reply: David Ford: "Re: Problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 23 2000 - 17:45:45 EDT