Re: Problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM

From: safemode (safemode@voicenet.com)
Date: Sat Sep 23 2000 - 18:27:20 EDT

  • Next message: David Ford: "Re: Problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM"

    Alan Cox wrote:

    > I have about 16 after 2 days. Thats a fairly typical desktop (gnome
    panel,
    > gfm and everything else is a terminal window)

    Whoa now?! 16 shm segments? ....if that's true something is terribly

    wrong with either X or the kernel's handling of shm .... that's scary.
    this
    is currently what i'm seeing after only 30 min of X
    ------ Shared Memory Status --------
    segments allocated 2008
    pages allocated 13842
    pages resident 12281
    pages swapped 1120
    Swap performance: 5517 attempts 1120 successes

    ------ Semaphore Status --------
    used arrays = 0
    allocated semaphores = 0

    ------ Messages: Status --------
    allocated queues = 0
    used headers = 0
    used space = 0 bytes

    It increases every time i execute the command ipcs -u
    i am not even running the amount of apps i normally do. This seems to
    be a
    leak, but i'm not sure if it's from X or the kernel. I'm leaning
    towards X
    at this point. But the real problem i have with is the kernel is
    crashing
    when the requests for shm segments goes over the max for a while.

    (could not mail back directly to alan *shrugs* )
    <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>:
    194.168.151.1 does not like recipient.
    550 rejected: administrative prohibition
    Giving up on 194.168.151.1.

    go figure

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 23 2000 - 18:28:48 EDT