Re: [RFC] Imminent death of /proc/locks predicted; film at 11

From: Alexander Viro (viro@math.psu.edu)
Date: Sat Sep 30 2000 - 19:33:15 EDT

  • Next message: Matthew Wilcox: "Re: [RFC] Imminent death of /proc/locks predicted; film at 11"

    On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Alan Cox wrote:

    > If it makes the code far cleaner then I have no objection. If we can do a
    > simple (different format even) /proc/locks to replace it that scores double
    > points ;)

    Additional bonus points for changing the name. /proc/fs/locks might be a
    good variant...

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 30 2000 - 19:34:25 EDT