Re: We interrupt you regularly scheduled catfight for.. Linux 2.2.18pre13

From: Alexander Viro (viro@math.psu.edu)
Date: Sat Sep 30 2000 - 20:02:53 EDT

  • Next message: Matthew Wilcox: "Re: [RFC] Imminent death of /proc/locks predicted; film at 11"

    On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:

    > Where does the idea that the kernel 'needs' a special compiler
    > come from ? I have been under the impression that that is just

    Mostly from the sad fact that it does.

    > what we were trying to get away from . I am reminded of other
    > os's that required their propritary compiler in order to create
    > a os image . Please let us not travel that road . Tia , JimL

    Patches are welcome. But keep in mind that we _are_ dependent on a
    particular compiler. gcc, that is. I would be glad to get rid of it - the
    codebase is extremely messy. However, removing gcc-isms is a huge
    work. You are welcome to do it, indeed, but so far nobody had done that.

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 30 2000 - 20:04:38 EDT