On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, Horst von Brand wrote:
> Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu> said:
>
> [...]
>
> > Patches are welcome. But keep in mind that we _are_ dependent on a
> > particular compiler. gcc, that is. I would be glad to get rid of it - the
> > codebase is extremely messy. However, removing gcc-isms is a huge
> > work. You are welcome to do it, indeed, but so far nobody had done that.
>
> Is there any _real_ gcc alternative in sight?
pcc might become such, but I'm not subscribing to that job.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Oct 01 2000 - 01:09:59 EDT