Re: Soft-Updates for Linux ?

From: Alexander Viro (viro@math.psu.edu)
Date: Sun Oct 01 2000 - 15:21:59 EDT

  • Next message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: Soft-Updates for Linux ?"

    On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Alan Cox wrote:

    > > I'm wondering if there are any plans to bring Kirk McKusick's "Soft-Updates"
    > > to Linux in 2.5 ??? Kirk has recently modified his licence (friendlier).
    > > I could only find some noncomittal postings on LKML from 1997.
    >
    > I think everyone is planning to go the whole way - that is to use full
    > journalled file systems - reiserfs, ext3, xfs, jffs, ibm jfs, .. whatever

    Not everyone. S-u is not a subset of journalling and IMNSHO it's way
    cleaner. Kirk's code can't be directly ported - too different VFS behind
    it, but the concept is sound and well-explored (thanks to Kirk). It can be
    implemented right now, but I hate to introduce the third patch with large
    VM changes - 3-way merge (VM parts of s-u/ext3/reiserfs) will suck rocks
    through the straw. Let's wait until VM infrastructure will be in place.

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Oct 01 2000 - 15:23:20 EDT