Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Sun Oct 01 2000 - 17:36:00 EDT

Next message: Igmar Palsenberg: "Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?"

Previous message: Olaf Titz: "Re: Linux 2.4-test9 kernel header flaw"
In reply to: Marc Lehmann: "Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?"
Next in thread: Marc Lehmann: "Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?"
Next in thread: Igmar Palsenberg: "Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?"
Next in thread: Igmar Palsenberg: "Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?"
Reply: Marc Lehmann: "Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> One never needed suse's or redhat's glibc to run binaries created on their
> platforms. Likewise one never needed their libstdc++ or their toolchain,

You regularly did. Even with libc5 there were two semi incompatible sets
of X libraries (with/without pthreads) and some other problems. Thats why we
need the LSB work

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Igmar Palsenberg: "Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?"
Previous message: Olaf Titz: "Re: Linux 2.4-test9 kernel header flaw"
In reply to: Marc Lehmann: "Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?"
Next in thread: Marc Lehmann: "Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?"
Next in thread: Igmar Palsenberg: "Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?"
Next in thread: Igmar Palsenberg: "Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?"
Reply: Marc Lehmann: "Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Oct 01 2000 - 18:27:09 EDT