Re: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95?

From: Alexander Viro (viro@math.psu.edu)
Date: Wed Oct 04 2000 - 01:15:09 EDT

  • Next message: Geoffrey Gallaway: "Re: kapmd cpu usage"

    On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Larry McVoy wrote:

    > hand picked tests. No faster. Just compiles slower. Add to that
    > some distributions BRAINDEAD default of havving colorgcc be the default
    > compiler (can you say fork perl to fork gcc? Can you say STUPID?), and

    ITYM "cute". As in "cute dancing paperclip". As colourized ls. Or rm
    aliased to rm -i for root. Or 31337 cAp1tAl1z3d directory names in root.
    Or manpages in HTML (yes, today I had to touch Slowlaris too, why are
    you asking?) Or info crap verbose as "War and Peace" instead of manpages.
    Or --ignore-fail-on-non-empty as rmdir option. Or "let's replace config
    files with directories full of one-liners since packagers can't be arsed
    to learn sed(1)" religion. Sigh...

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 04 2000 - 01:15:57 EDT