RE: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95?

From: Purtell, Andrew (Andrew_Purtell@NAI.com)
Date: Fri Oct 06 2000 - 14:33:38 EDT

Next message: Ziad Sayegh: "TCP/IP User mode Port"

Previous message: Marty Fouts: "RE: Tux 2 patents"
Maybe in reply to: John Anthony Kazos Jr.: "Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Is this a problem where the code produced by 2.95 was non-optimal in some
significant way or simply incorrect, or is it really just a subjective
"takes to long to compile XXX" thing?

Andrew Purtell
NAI Labs at Network Associates, Inc. Los Angeles, CA
PGP Keys: ldap://certserver.pgp.com
PGP Fingerprint: 5A21 10DB 92B0 CE20 80B4 90D7 A89C D464 AA0A A616

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.1
Comment: Crypto Provided by Network Associates <http://www.nai.com>

iQA/AwUBOd4bNaic1GSqCqYWEQJGHQCeNwodLtadXU+kwIXW0Q+6zQMl3c4AoLs6
3KKAuVzXn757Bsp5RrdGZsAT
=1uvj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Ziad Sayegh: "TCP/IP User mode Port"
Previous message: Marty Fouts: "RE: Tux 2 patents"
Maybe in reply to: John Anthony Kazos Jr.: "Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Oct 06 2000 - 14:37:29 EDT