Re: BUG in tcp.c ?

From: Marcelo Tosatti (marcelo@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Fri Oct 06 2000 - 15:45:47 EDT

Next message: Jeff V. Merkey: "Re: Tux 2 patents"

Previous message: Jeff V. Merkey: "Re: Tux 2 patents"
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: BUG in tcp.c ?"
Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: BUG in tcp.c ?"
Reply: David S. Miller: "Re: BUG in tcp.c ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, 6 Oct 2000, David S. Miller wrote:

> Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 19:25:38 -0300 (BRST)
> From: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
>
> Is this an actual bug, or am I overlooking something?
>
> It is a bug and I'll change TCP's sendmsg to use sk->allocation as it
> should. Thanks for pointing this out.

2.2.17 is broken too.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jeff V. Merkey: "Re: Tux 2 patents"
Previous message: Jeff V. Merkey: "Re: Tux 2 patents"
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: BUG in tcp.c ?"
Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: BUG in tcp.c ?"
Reply: David S. Miller: "Re: BUG in tcp.c ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Oct 06 2000 - 18:44:30 EDT