Re: No SCSI burning problem (was: Bug in "ide-pci.c")

From: Jeff V. Merkey (jmerkey@vger.timpanogas.org)
Date: Sat Oct 07 2000 - 14:37:12 EDT

Next message: Pavel Machek: "Re: one-line umount patch needed for am-utils"

Previous message: Jeff V. Merkey: "Re: Tux 2 patents"
In reply to: Andre Hedrick: "Re: No SCSI burning problem (was: Bug in "ide-pci.c")"
Next in thread: Jeff V. Merkey: "Re: No SCSI burning problem (was: Bug in "ide-pci.c")"
Next in thread: Sean Estabrooks: "Re: Bug in "ide-pci.c""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 11:16:30AM -0700, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Oct 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
>
> > append "hdd=ide-scsi"

Am I doing this wrong? It seems to work.

:-)

Jeff

>
> append "hdd=scsi" is better.
>
> Andre Hedrick
> The Linux ATA/IDE guy
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Pavel Machek: "Re: one-line umount patch needed for am-utils"
Previous message: Jeff V. Merkey: "Re: Tux 2 patents"
In reply to: Andre Hedrick: "Re: No SCSI burning problem (was: Bug in "ide-pci.c")"
Next in thread: Jeff V. Merkey: "Re: No SCSI burning problem (was: Bug in "ide-pci.c")"
Next in thread: Sean Estabrooks: "Re: Bug in "ide-pci.c""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Oct 07 2000 - 14:43:29 EDT