Re: Am I the only one with scsi-ide CDR problems?

• Previous message: Leigh Orf: "ide-scsi + /dev/dsp == solid lockup"
• In reply to: safemode: "Am I the only one with scsi-ide CDR problems?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

safemode wrote:
>
> I'm just wondering if I'm the only person who has had problems with
> 2.4.0-test9 recording on ide-scsi cdr's?
> Nobody has posted anything about it and the test10-prex changefiles don't
> mention it. cdrecord reports very weird results when scanning the scsi
> bus whereas dmesg shows what one would expect of the ide-scsi detection.
> anyone?

Actually, I think it's on the TODO list for 2.4. That's definitely the
sort of thing to fix. I think the exact syntax was "cdrecord produces
shiny coasters" or something similar.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Jim Freeman: "hfmodem compile deaths [2.2.18pre15 / CONFIG_HFMODEM]"
• Previous message: Leigh Orf: "ide-scsi + /dev/dsp == solid lockup"
• In reply to: safemode: "Am I the only one with scsi-ide CDR problems?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Oct 14 2000 - 10:07:24 EDT