Re: [RFC] atomic pte updates and pae changes, take 2

From: Stephen Tweedie (sct@redhat.com)
Date: Sat Oct 14 2000 - 09:33:09 EDT

  • Next message: John Cavan: "Re: lockup with parport_pc on 2.4.0-test10-pre1"

    Hi,

    On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 08:17:42PM -0400, Ben LaHaise wrote:
    >
    > Below is take two of the patch making pte_clear use atomic xchg in an
    > effort to avoid the loss of dirty bits. PAE no longer uses cmpxchg8 for
    > updates; set_pte is two ordered long writes with a barrier.

    Looks good. The only trouble I can see left is that pte_clear() is
    still using set_pte(), which doesn't work right for PAE36. set_pte()
    is setting the high word first, which is fine for installing a new pte,
    but if you do that to clear a pte then you have left the old
    page-present bit intact while you've removed have of the pte.
    pte_clear() needs to clear the words in the other order (just as
    pte_get_and_clear correctly does).

    Cheers,
     Stephen
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Oct 14 2000 - 10:42:05 EDT